Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Khani

Phd. Hamidreza Ghelichkhani,
year 12, Issue 23 (3-2023)
Abstract

Mir Ali Heravi (died in 1545) is one of the greatest masters in Nasta’liq script who was famous and popular while he was alive among Uzbek, Indian and Ottoman governors. Majnoun Rafiqi is also one of the poets and calligraphers who is contemporary with Mir Ali and has written three treatises about teaching calligraphy. He was famous in his own period of time but since he did not have well-known works, his popularity has decreased over time. Attributing ancient treatises about teaching calligraphy to celebrities has a long duration. For instance, attributing Adab al-Mashq treatise by Baba Shah Isfahani to Mir Emad Qazvini. Khat va Savad treatise by Majnoun Rafiqi has been attributed to Mir Ali because of his universal popularity after Safavid. This attribution caused contemporary researchers think that there is a treatise named Medad al-Khotout by Mir Ali Heravi and this mistake has been repeated in many researches by Islamic art scholars. According to the comparative study of these two treatises and also documentary sources related to the end of Timurid and beginning of Safavid era, this article has talked about non-attribution of this treatise to Mir Ali Heravi.

Mahdi Ghadyani, Mohammad Shokri, Minoo Khani,
year 14, Issue 28 (6-2024)
Abstract

Umberto Eco's semiotics in cinema is based on the elements of expression and content, culture, and interpretation. In this context, codes, which are the relationships between expression and content, are of particular importance. On the other hand, Iranian postmodern cinema is a critique of tradition, society, family, identity, and truth in the context of culture. The representation of these expressions in postmodern cinema leads to interpretations by the audience, in which cultural aspects play a significant role. According to Eco's semiotics, codes are formed by events, associations, representations, conventions, correlations, implications, interpretations, descriptions, narratives, and conceptual codes. These codes reflect Eco's contribution to semiotics in cinema and provide a more precise understanding of Iranian postmodern cinema.Despite all of this, it is clear that there is currently no complete system for the semiotics of postmodern cinema. This means that we are still learning and discovering how signs and meanings function in films. However, there are general rules for codes that also apply to cinema and film. These rules refer to how signs relate to meanings and how those meanings are interpreted by audiences. In Iranian postmodern cinema, signs, symbols, and codes play a key role in the representation and interpretation of a new reality. This is consistent with Eco's view of signs and events.The meaning of Iranian postmodern films is constantly changing and evolving. This is due to the intertextuality of this type of cinema. In this type of cinema, filmmakers use numerous references to other cinematic, literary, and artistic works. This adds new layers of meaning to the film and allows informed audiences to interpret the work in multiple ways.Overall, Iranian postmodern cinema, from the perspective of Eco's semiotics, deals with the representation and interpretation of a new reality. This is done through the use of signs, symbols, and codes, as well as intertextuality. This research is theoretical-applied in terms of its purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of its method. The statistical population of some works of world and Iranian postmodern cinema and also a case study of Mohammadreza Aslani's film "Chess of the Wind" have been considered.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Scientific Journal of Pazhuhesh-e Honar

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb